The recent NEET controversy surrounding the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET-UG) has highlighted significant issues in the integrity of India’s examination system. Allegations of paper leaks and misconduct have cast a shadow over one of the country’s most critical medical entrance exams. This editorial explores the need for stringent Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to ensure transparent and fair examinations across India.
This editorial is based on “Preventing another NEET fiasco” which was published in The Hindu on 26/06/2024. The article examines the allegations of misconduct and paper leaks during the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET-UG) and advocates for the implementation and compliance of comprehensive Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to ensure a transparent examination system in the country.
Understanding the issues around NEET-UG and the proposed solutions is crucial for UPSC aspirants. This topic is directly relevant to GS Paper 2, covering education, governance, and transparency. It helps in understanding the mechanisms of fair examination systems and the role of government agencies, aiding in comprehensive exam preparation.
The NEET-UG controversy has brought to the fore critical issues of examination integrity and transparency, vital for UPSC aspirants to understand. With the Union Government’s response and Supreme Court’s intervention, the topic connects directly to previous UPSC questions on governance, transparency, and educational reforms, making it a timely and relevant subject for comprehensive analysis.
NEET-UG is a pivotal medical entrance exam in India, conducted annually by the National Testing Agency (NTA) for admission to undergraduate medical courses. It plays a crucial role in the Indian education system, ensuring standardized assessment for aspiring medical professionals.
NEET-UG is a national-level medical entrance exam conducted by the NTA for admissions into undergraduate medical courses such as MBBS, BDS, and AYUSH programs.
Initially, NEET-UG was conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). However, in 2018, the responsibility was transferred to the National Testing Agency (NTA).
The exam is conducted in 11 languages, including English, Hindi, and regional languages. It covers courses like MBBS, BDS, AYUSH, and BVSc & AH.
Established in 2017, the NTA is an autonomous and self-sustained testing organization responsible for conducting entrance examinations for higher educational institutions in India.
The NTA was established as a Society registered under the Indian Societies Registration Act, 1860, to conduct entrance exams for higher education.
NTA conducts major exams like JEE-Main, NEET-UG, and CUET for undergraduate admissions, along with exams like UGC-NET and CSIR UGC-NET for postgraduate admissions.
NTA is governed by a Chairperson appointed by the Ministry of Education, with a Director General as the CEO. It follows directives from the Government of India and its General Body.
NTA identifies partner institutions, creates question banks, collaborates with international organizations, and conducts various other entrusted examinations.
The NEET-UG 2024 results were marred by allegations of misconduct, including paper leaks and unusually high scores, raising concerns about the integrity of the examination process.
Aspirants raised issues such as grace marks awarded to over 1,500 students, an unusually high number of perfect scores, and allegations of a leaked question paper.
The NTA attributed the increase in high scorers to a larger pool of candidates and the relative ease of the 2024 exam. Compensatory marks were given for loss of time.
The Supreme Court ordered a retest for 1,563 students who were given grace marks. The retest was conducted on June 23, 2024, without halting the admissions counseling process.
The government formed a high-level committee to investigate the NTA’s functioning and removed the NTA chief. The CBI took over the investigation following evidence of a paper leak.
| Political: The involvement of the National Testing Agency (NTA), established by the Ministry of Education, and the introduction of The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 highlight the government’s role in managing educational standards and ensuring fairness in examinations. The Supreme Court’s intervention and the dismissal of the NTA chief underscore the political pressure and legal scrutiny surrounding educational governance. Economic: Frequent exam malpractices and the need for retests impose financial burdens on the administration and candidates. Implementing stringent security measures like blockchain and encryption technology will entail significant costs but are crucial for maintaining the credibility of the examination system, which directly impacts the nation’s educational investments. Social: The integrity of NEET affects social trust in the educational system. Frequent leaks and unfair practices can demoralize students, affecting societal perceptions of meritocracy and equality in educational opportunities, as enshrined in Articles 14 and 21A of the Constitution. Technological: The recommendation for computer-based testing and the use of advanced security technologies like blockchain reflect a shift towards digitalization in managing examinations. These technologies aim to enhance security and transparency but require robust infrastructure and familiarity among all stakeholders. Environmental: While not directly impacted, the move towards digital exams could reduce the environmental footprint by minimizing paper usage and logistical movements associated with traditional exams. Legal: The establishment of The Public Examinations Act, 2024, introduces legal frameworks to combat cheating with severe penalties for malpractice. This legal reinforcement is critical to uphold the lawfulness of educational assessments and ensure compliance across various jurisdictions. |
India’s education and examination system is underpinned by constitutional mandates and various government initiatives. These provisions ensure equal and fair opportunities for all students.
Key articles include Article 21A (Right to Education), Article 14 (Right to Equality), Article 15 (Prohibition of Discrimination), Article 46 (Promotion of Educational Interests), and Article 45 (Early Childhood Care and Education).
Major initiatives include the New Education Policy 2020, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan, and Rashtriya Uchhattar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA).
The Public Examinations Act, 2024, aims to prevent unfair practices in public examinations, introducing stringent measures to curb cheating.
The Act lays down parameters for Computer-Based Tests (CBT) and involves the National Recruitment Agency in setting standards. It includes severe penalties for malpractice and organized cheating.
Critics argue that existing anti-cheating laws have been ineffective, and the focus on punitive measures may overshadow the need for systemic educational reforms. Organized cheating remains a significant challenge.
To safeguard the integrity of India’s examination system, several proactive measures are proposed.
The creation of NEIC is proposed to oversee and ensure uniform standards across major examinations in India.
Key positions within examination bodies should be filled based on merit, with robust whistleblower protection mechanisms in place.
Adopting an on-demand computer-based testing model can reduce logistical burdens and mitigate the risk of leaks.
Implementing blockchain and state-of-the-art encryption can secure examination processes, ensuring tamper-evident records.
Strict enforcement of penalties for malpractice, coupled with improved supervision and secure transportation and storage of exam materials, is essential.
Double-blind evaluation and quick grievance resolution can enhance fairness and reduce errors in the examination process.
Incorporating continuous assessment and project work can alleviate the pressure of single-day exams and provide a more holistic evaluation.
Ethics workshops and awareness campaigns can foster a culture of integrity and fairness in examinations.
By implementing these measures, India can build a more equitable and reliable examination system. Thereby, we ensure that the aspirations of millions of students are protected and the educational foundation of the nation is strengthened.
By fostering a culture of integrity at every level—through enhanced surveillance, robust governance frameworks, and comprehensive stakeholder engagement. We can safeguard the sanctity of examinations. This vision not only protects the aspirations of millions of students but also strengthens India’s educational foundation, paving the way for a more equitable and merit-based society.
| UPSC Civil Services Examination, Previous Year Questions (PYQs) Mains Q. The quality of higher education in India requires major improvements to make it internationally competitive. Do you think that the entry of foreign educational institutions would help improve the quality of higher and technical education in the country? Discuss. (GS-II, 2015) Q. The NEET-UG result controversy of 2024 has brought to light the pervasive issue of paper leaks in India. Evaluate the effectiveness of current measures to prevent such leaks and suggest additional steps to ensure the integrity of public examinations. |
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita aims to modernize India's criminal justice system. It replaces the outdated…
India's prison system exemplifies severe issues, namely overcrowding, violation of human rights, and neglect of…
Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana - Rural (PMAY-R) Marks 8 Years Mission: Offers housing to the…
Launched in 2016, the Start-up India Scheme is an initiative to promote innovation and entrepreneurship…
India's impressive economic growth hides a troubling paradox: the lack of quality job creation for…
10 Years of Polio Eradication in India WHO declared India polio-free in 2014 after three…