Agrarian distress in India continues to be a persistent issue, with farmers continuing to demand a legal guarantee for MSPs for 23 crops to address declining incomes and rising risks due to climate change and high input costs. The fiscal and inflationary implications of a legally mandated MSP regime make this infeasible, thus calling for alternatives such as DPPs or direct income support. Balancing the needs of farmers’ incomes, sustainable agricultural practices, and food security imperatives address these demands.
| GS Paper | GS Paper II |
| Topics for UPSC Prelims | Minimum support prices, Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices , Shanta Kumar Committee, FRP for sugarcane, WTO’s Peace Clause, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, e-NAM, Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, Zero Budget Natural Farming. |
| Topics for UPSC Mains | Arguments in Favour and Against Legalising MSP, Measures to Strengthen the MSP System in India |
This editorial is based on “Unrest over minimum support prices” which was published in The Financial Express on 28/11/2024. The article brings into picture the growing agrarian distress as farmers demand a legal guarantee for MSPs to counter declining incomes and rising risks. It highlights the need for alternatives like deficiency payments and direct income support to ensure sustainability and food security.
UPSC aspirants must understand the intricacies of the MSP system and the debates surrounding its legalization. This topic is directly relevant to the UPSC syllabus – government policies, agricultural marketing, and food security. All these ideas will equip the student with comprehensive answers and be able to think critically about issues in agriculture.
The issue of legalizing Minimum Support Price (MSP) has become important in India due to increasing agrarian distress. Farmers are demanding a legal guarantee for MSP to combat declining incomes and rising risks, which has major fiscal, inflationary, and policy implications. This topic is important for UPSC aspirants as it relates to government policies, economic stability, and sustainable agriculture, topics that frequently come up in the exam. Previous UPSC questions have delved into MSP mechanisms, reflecting its enduring relevance in civil services preparation.
The government initiated the Minimum Support Price (MSP) in 1965 with the establishment of the Agricultural Prices Commission, now referred to as the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP). The government uses MSP to ensure that farmers receive adequate compensation for their produce and are protected from a significant decline in prices. It also helps in maintaining national food security. This is a price guarantee system, which helps stabilize the finances of farmers.
The CACP computes MSP from three cost categories of production: A2, A2+FL, and C2. A2 comprises direct costs such as seeds and fertilizers. A2+FL adds the value of unpaid family labor, and C2 includes comprehensive costs, including land rental and interest on fixed assets. Generally, the government fixes MSP at 1.5 times the A2+FL cost so that farmers recover their production costs and make a profit.
MSP covers 23 mandated crops, which include staples like wheat and rice, and other crops like pulses, oilseeds, and cotton. Besides, MSP is also available for Toria (a type of rapeseed) and de-husked coconut based on copra. The coverage is vast in order to support diversified agricultural production and to ensure the farmers have a guaranteed market for their crops.
Legalizing MSP is beneficial in many ways since the farmers will get proper compensation; stability in agriculture will improve the scenario. It saves them from market volatility, hence supports investment in better farming. By ensuring income, rural distress is reduced and farmers get incentives to adopt sustainable agriculture to contribute to food and economic security.
Legal MSP protects farmers from price volatility, which is unpredictable in nature. This ensures that farmers get fair compensation irrespective of the market conditions. Small and marginal farmers are highly vulnerable to market volatility, so this protection is crucial to sustain their livelihoods during periods of surplus production or global trade disruptions.
Legal MSP may balance regional disparities by ensuring equitable compensation for farmers throughout the states. This encourages the production of a variety of crops, disperses procurement concentration from a few regions, and aids agricultural growth in under-represented areas to promote balanced regional development.
A legal MSP would provide predictable income, reducing the financial stress leading to farmer self-harm. It reduces dependence on credit and helps to alleviate rural distress, which contributes to the overall well-being of farming communities and reduces the incidences of farmer suicides.
Assured returns through a legal MSP are more likely to make farmers invest in better seeds, technologies, and sustainable practices, which results in increased productivity and profitability and fosters a more resilient agricultural sector. For example, FRP for sugarcane has motivated farmers to invest in inputs, leading to an increase in productivity.
Legal MSP can decrease the power of exploitative intermediaries who dominate agricultural markets. It ensures that the farmers get a minimum price by which they can directly receive fair compensation, thus reducing the exploitative practices of middlemen and empowering farmers economically.
Legal MSP ensures income stability in the face of unpredictable climate, thus protecting the farmer from the effects of adverse weather conditions. With this stability, farmers can better manage their livelihoods in the midst of increasing climate risks, despite crop losses due to erratic weather patterns.
Legal MSP will help in aligning production with global demand, which will boost exports. The predictable pricing regime enhances the competitiveness of Indian agricultural products in international markets, which leads to a favorable trade balance and strengthens the country’s position in global agricultural trade.
While MSP legalization holds potential benefits, it is associated with significant challenges, including a substantial fiscal burden on the government, difficulties in implementing it in unregulated markets, and inflationary pressures. It may conflict with international trade norms, inefficient resource allocation, exacerbate environmental issues, and overburden government procurement mechanisms.
A legal MSP would thus present a substantial financial burden on the government. The total cost of guaranteeing MSP to all crops could be pretty high, touching fiscal sustainability. In doing so, it also means that its long-term cost may not be an economical one to sustain in its very survival.
Most of the agricultural transactions take place outside regulated markets, making enforcement of a legal MSP challenging. Past attempts to impose MSP have been resisted and experienced practical difficulties, indicating the complexity involved in monitoring and ensuring compliance across diverse and informal market channels.
This means that the legal MSP may contribute to food inflation as high crop prices are mandatorily provided, adversely affecting consumers, especially the economically vulnerable. It can create overall economic instability as food prices increase, causing the cost of living to increase and eventually leading to broader inflationary pressures.
Legalizing MSP may even run into the WTO norms on subsidies to agriculture. This, in turn, may pose a threat to trade warfare. India had crossed these limits in its previous subsidies and had drawn international protests. Thus, it continues to be an issue under international trade discussions.
Legal MSP can induce unbalanced cultivation of crops. This may lead to inefficient allocation of resources. Groundwater depletion and degradation of soil are some issues that may be exacerbated, particularly in areas that are already facing environmental challenges. Balancing crop production is thus essential for sustainable agriculture.
MSP-supported monoculture of highly water-consuming crops will lead to the loss of biodiversity, salt accumulation in soil, and green house gases. This has been witnessed in sugar cane production, which consumes water at high rates, which enhances environmental degradation.
Legalizing MSP would require universal procurement, which would overwhelm the present storage and distribution systems. India has a severe shortage of storage capacity, and legal MSP would increase procurement, overburdening the present systems, causing logistical bottlenecks, and handling and distributing agricultural produce in an inefficient manner.
A legal MSP, which focuses only on price guarantees without dealing with deeper structural issues in agricultural markets, such as inefficient APMC systems, will be less effective. To make a well-functioning and efficient agricultural marketing system work for farmers, it is important to have overall market reforms.
There are several method to enhance MSP system. These include the implementation of a DPP system, promotion of decentralized procurement mechanisms, modernization of APMCs, encouragement of crop diversification, and integration of climate-resilient support mechanisms. Strengthening FPOs, expansion of warehousing capacities, and aligning MSP with export strategies can also improve the system.
A DPP system can compensate farmers for the gap between MSP and market prices through direct transfers. This reduces the fiscal burden of large-scale procurement while ensuring fair compensation for farmers. DPP can be implemented all over the country, combined with digital platforms for real-time price tracking, to bridge income gaps effectively.
Decentralization of procurement to include state governments and local self-help groups ensures broader geographical coverage and equitable benefit distribution. Success stories like Chhattisgarh’s decentralized paddy procurement speak for themselves as a tool for regional disparity redressal and reduction of pressures on the central storage systems.
The modernization and integration of APMCs with e-NAM shall create transparent and competitive marketplaces. More number of APMC markets, efficiency enhancement, and digital literacy for the farmers can enable them to negotiate better prices without being exploited at the hands of middlemen and better market access.
Higher MSPs for pulses, oilseeds, and millets would divert attention from water-intensive crops, in line with the agenda of sustainable agriculture. Experience with millet promotion programs indicates how tailored MSPs can encourage diversification, promote agroecology, and reduce the degradation of the environment.
Introducing climate-smart MSPs that take into account risks such as erratic rainfall and pest attacks can create a safety net for climate-vulnerable farmers. Linking MSP with insurance schemes like PMFBY can provide comprehensive support, reducing the economic impact of climate-related crop failures and promoting resilience.
FPOs and MSP operation linkage ensure collective bargaining power as they cut down intermediaries and allow direct market linkage. It aligns with the government’s objectives for creating 10,000 FPOs to empower small and marginal farmers and enhance their market access and negotiating power.
This can address environmental concerns by making MSP conditional on adherence to sustainable agricultural practices. Incentivizing farmers through a “green MSP” linked to sustainability metrics can promote practices like reduced chemical fertilizer use and organic farming, contributing to long-term environmental health and agricultural sustainability.
Significant storage deficits can be addressed through investments in modern warehousing infrastructure. Expanding cold storage chains for perishable crops ensures MSP coverage for horticultural products, reducing post-harvest losses and thereby improving price realization for farmers, which is a comprehensive way of increasing the overall efficiency of the agricultural supply chain.
Aligning MSP policies with export-oriented production can enhance global competitiveness. Encouraging crops like basmati rice and certain oilseeds, backed by MSP and quality certification, can boost agricultural exports, reduce the fiscal burden of domestic procurement, and strengthen India’s agricultural trade balance.
Linking MSP procured crops to agro-processing industries will help in value addition and reduction of wastage. Setting up processing units in key production areas will generate income for the farmers and create rural employment supporting schemes like PM Kisan Sampada Yojana aimed at strengthening post-harvest infrastructure.
With these technological advancements in AI and blockchain, the possibility can also be created for a live market price monitoring transparency on MSP implementation. Price predictability can help farmers improve selection of crops and bring agricultural markets more effectively for enhancing its efficiency.
Introducing a tiered MSP structure based on crop quality can encourage farmers to invest in better seeds and post-harvest handling. Higher MSP for premium-grade grains can incentivize the production of export-quality commodities, contributing to higher income for farmers and improved agricultural standards.
Streamlining input subsidies as direct cash transfers to farmers can allow them to invest flexibly in production while reducing government expenditure. Models such as Telangana’s Rythu Bandhu scheme can be scaled up across the country, linked with MSP guarantees to ensure income support and financial stability for farmers.
Dedicated MSP monitoring committees can be set up to oversee the implementation process, redress grievances of farmers, and ensure timely payments. A robust system for agricultural markets can bring accountability and transparency, ensuring the effectiveness of the MSP system and fair compensation for farmers.
Expanding MSP coverage to include new-age crops such as quinoa, flaxseed, and medicinal plants can reflect changing consumer demand and export potential. This diversification will improve farmers’ sources of income, align India’s agricultural strategy with global trends, and support the growth of emerging agricultural sectors.
| Political: Legalizing MSP could strengthen the government’s commitment to farmer welfare, addressing agrarian distress and promoting national food security. However, political challenges arise in managing its fiscal implications and balancing state interests. It could also lead to conflicts between local and central government powers over policy implementation and oversight. Economic: Legalizing MSP can stabilize farmers’ incomes, encourage investment in agriculture, and reduce market volatility. However, it poses a significant fiscal burden on the government, with concerns about inflationary pressures and potential trade conflicts. Additionally, resource misallocation and overproduction of certain crops can harm the economy in the long term. Social: Legal MSP could reduce rural distress, lower farmer suicides, and ensure fair compensation across regions. It can also foster social equity by supporting diverse crop cultivation. However, the system may inadvertently favor larger farmers over smaller ones, exacerbating inequalities within the agricultural sector. Technological: Integrating technology into MSP, like digital platforms for procurement, AI for price monitoring, and blockchain for transparency, could streamline operations. These technologies may enhance efficiency and reduce exploitation by middlemen. However, challenges persist in extending technological infrastructure to remote rural areas, limiting the system’s effectiveness. Environmental: While MSP could provide stability against climate-related crop failures, it could also lead to environmental degradation. The overproduction of water-intensive crops and monocultures may deplete resources and harm biodiversity. Ensuring sustainable agricultural practices linked to MSP is essential to mitigate the environmental impact of such a policy. Legal: Legalizing MSP would require significant changes to India’s agricultural laws, potentially creating friction with international trade agreements like those under the WTO. Furthermore, enforcing MSP across unregulated markets and ensuring transparency could strain legal systems, requiring enhanced monitoring, grievance redress mechanisms, and compliance enforcement. |
The debate on MSP’s legalization brings forth the need for a balanced approach that addresses farmer welfare, fiscal sustainability, and food security. Measures such as DPPs, decentralized procurement, market reforms, and sustainable practices are essential to creating a robust agricultural system. Addressing market imperfections, climate risks, and low incomes can ensure a sustainable agricultural future for all stakeholders in India.
| UPSC Civil Services Examination, Previous Year Questions (PYQs) Mains Q. The Minimum Support Price (MSP) system has been a long-standing mechanism to ensure the welfare of farmers in India. However, the system faces several challenges. Examine the arguments for and against legalizing MSP, and discuss measures that could be adopted to strengthen the MSP system in India. (UPSC Mains 2021, GS Paper III) Q. The Minimum Support Price (MSP) system is intended to protect farmers from price volatility and ensure a minimum level of income. Discuss the arguments in favor and against legalizing MSP for all crops in India. What are the potential fiscal, inflationary, and market distortions that could arise from a legally binding MSP regime? How can India strike a balance between farmers’ welfare and macroeconomic stability? |
The Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) is the most important body that shapes…
India’s Digital India Act Draft Released The Digital India Act intends to update the IT…
Fit India Movement is a call to create a fit society. Fit India Movement will…
Sports education in India is vital for physical, mental development, promoting discipline, teamwork, and improving…
India Becomes 4th Largest Producer of Green Energy India overtook Germany to take the fourth…
The significance of Upanishads in history lies in their profound influence on Indian philosophy, religion,…