There has been much debate in India on the Citizenship Amendment Act and the NRC. CAA is not the same legislation as that of the NRC dealing with citizenship rights in India. The difference between them is such that the former seeks accelerated citizenship for a few minorities residing in neighborly countries, and the latter deals with the issue of citizenship status for persons dwelling in India. Both policies have attracted much public interest and have instilled fear about their impact on several communities. Major Concerns of CAA and NRC:
It happened in 2019; the Indian Parliament passed the act called the Citizenship Amendment Act, or CAA, a concept to provide religious minorities living in the Islamic-dominated countries of India’s neighboring countries with an opportunity to have their citizenship status. Among its provisions, the CAA accelerates the attainment of citizenship for those from these groups who entered the country before 31 December 2014 and fleeing persecution – which include: Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh countries.
The government contends that the CAA corrects a historic wrong by easing persecution of minorities. The exclusion of Muslims, however, has witnessed these protests. Critics hold that it violates India’s secular constitution and has been creating religion-based bias. The act has caused protests throughout the country where most feel it is a divisive tool that could further fortify Muslims at the margins.
The NRC is a list designed to find out and deport illegal immigrants in India. Though implemented till now only in Assam, the government is all set to introduce it at the national level. It will provide an overall count of all citizens in India and filter out the non-citizens staying there illegally. For proof of citizenship, people have to submit papers proving that their ancestors had been residents in India, often several generations ago.
The most controversial issue about NRC is that many people may not be able to prove their ancestry. The majority of the people, especially in rural areas, do not have proper documentation, and thus they may be vulnerable to being named as non-citizens. If the NRC is merged with the CAA, then those individuals who are excluded by NRC but are not included in the CAA stand a risk of statelessness.
The other reason and the serious criticism against CAA and NRC is that two measures will affect the Muslim community adversely. While the CAA grants citizenship to minority groups persecuted in neighboring nations, Muslims are excluded therefrom. Along with it, NRC, citizens who cannot prove citizenship based on NRC may lose statehood.
The opposition feels that the CAA and NRC are creating an environment of fear and dividing people. The government has asserted that such legislation is essential for the national security of the country as well as for its control over immigration, but human rights organizations and activists argue that they create inequality. Muslim people were excluded from CAA and the rigid process for the NRC led to large-scale disenfranchisement. The main sufferers are going to be marginalized communities.
The CAA and NRC have ignited street demonstrations in India. More are now of the opinion that these laws violate the country’s secular character. There have been protests since December last year and continued right into January 2020, by people from different walks of life opposing CAA and NRC. Several Indian states have further filed objections to the inclusion of the NRC as it applies to the territorial jurisdiction they administer, hence deepening the chasm between the Center and regional regimes.
The CAA and NRC also attracted international pressure, wherein many human rights organizations branded the laws as discriminatory. The UN and other world bodies questioned whether these laws conform to India’s obligation under the general international law. Time only will tell the long-term impact of CAA and NRC on India’s democratic and secular traditions but shows no signs of abating in controversies.
Protests and legal issues also arise for the CAA and NRC. Various petitions have been raised against the Indian Supreme Court also, for stating that the CAA violated the Indian Constitution by damaging Article 14: a provision regarding the right of equality. They criticize it by saying that same does not match the basic principles of secularism applied to the nation of India.
Politically, CAA and NRC have brought division, with the ruling party actively defending the laws and the opposition protesting against them. For the next couple of years, the way these laws function will remain the focus point for Indian politics.
Debates on the CAA and NRC continue. Despite all these developments, such an atmosphere continues and has taken shape across various corners. How they would be executed throughout the nation remains still a mystery due to further legal challenges against the enactment of the two laws by protesting crowds in several pockets of the nation. It is perceived that these acts are essential by the Indian government for ensuring national security and for taking corrective steps towards illegal immigration while being vehemently opposed on grounds of diluting the very ethos of a pluralistic secular nation like India.
Industrial Corridors has been an essential factor for accelerating economic growth. They also played a…
India's maritime sector is very vital for country's trade and economic aspirations for it generates…
Supreme Court Highlights Gaps in India’s Anti-Trafficking Efforts SC found that the government has made…
Consumer rights have become integral parts of the modern world. Essentially, they guarantee buyers fair…
India's healthcare system is marked by issues of multiple dimensions, requiring urgent attention and reform.…
UNFCCC Conference Advances Carbon Market Standards (COP-29) New carbon market standards support a centralized carbon…